On 2008-11-08 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just realized: doesn't Nikos' patch actually do two separate things?
>> 1) Add the BER stuff needed to support the PKCS#12 blob >> 2) Optimize tree generation by using the small_value field. >> It is the 2) that causes the ABI break, but 1) that is needed to solve >> to the regression. [...] > I don't think this is a question that we would like to set to > ourselves. It leads to another questions on which optimization would > be good enough or which addition is good enough to justify the break. > The real question would be whether we want the internal structures > published on the public API. I don't think we want this. It leads to > us being handicap (like we are now) to apply any optimization/addition > to the internal works of the library. Thus for me it is a good thing > to move them away as soon as we can to allow further development on > libtasn1. [...] Hello, Simon had already done this in git, the latest daily snapshots have moved the struct definition to an internal header. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
