On 06.11.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, > > Any further ideas? > > One and a half. > > Half: Looking for specific files (here: 00tetex.cnf) without > DebPkgProvidedMaps. This would, however, create a danger of getting > back to maintainer scripts which give the reader exactly the same > kind of "fun" we had in teTeX. > Well, this was exactly my suggestion, IIRC. > One: We already do that. > > $ egrep -v '^$|^#' texlive-base/debian/texlive-common.postinst.pre > for i in updmap.d/10tetex-base.cfg fmt.d/01tetex.cnf language.d/00tetex.cnf > language.d/10tetex.cnf ; do > if [ -r /etc/texmf/$i ] ; then > mv /etc/texmf/$i /etc/texmf/$i.obsolete > echo "Obsolete config file /etc/texmf/$i has been renamed" >&2 > echo "as /etc/texmf/$i.obsolete." >&2 > fi > done > > In other words: We move fmt.d/01tetex.cnf to > fmt.d/01tetex.cnf.obsolete. Either this is the worng[1] filename, > or rather we had both... > Any package script of teTeX bin (I don't remember which) moves a file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/00tetex.cnf to /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf, i.e. Hence 00tetex.cnf was the old name and 01tetex.cnf and we should extend the snippet above.... H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
