Hi! Even though the original codebase might be unclean, and it is uncertain whether snacc should be replaced by eSnacc, I don't see any reason why this proposed bugfix is not applied to make the package build.
Other packages have build-dependencies on snacc (I originally just wanted to compile kismet on amd64)... Thanks for your consideration! -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
