On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:54:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:20:35PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Note that the list of regressions differ by architecture, but it > > is probably not useful at this point to make a separate bug for > > each of them, right? > Yes, they differ by architecture, because the list has been established > by building the package on a machine, verifying that there is no > regression compared to version 2.7 and use the result as a baseline. > > We definitely have something different on those machines compared to the > machines I used. I think it may be the kernel.
The buildd in question runs Etch's kernel (2.6.18-6-mckinley #1 SMP Fri Jun 6 23:07:37 UTC 2008). Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
