On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Julien _FrnchFrgg_ RIVAUD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You probably want a solution like the attached patch. Without the > |checklevel| logic, it produces the same result as your patch but by using > the standard menu mechanism (and if the toplevel name is not "Debian" it > will change accordingly, contrary to your patch); with the |checklevel| > logic, it moreover skips the toplevel menu opening and closing if there is > only one zero-level menu (I don't know if it's possible to have several, but > better be safe than sorry; merging two unrelated menus is bad)
Thanks for the patch. This works like a charm--the checklevel logic is definitely preferred but I wasn't sure how to use it, so I decided to model my solution after the way Fluxbox implements menu. However, this is definitely better--I just stripped off the extra commented level numbers. I figure I'll wait a bit to push this one, since my track record is rather bad on this setup. Thanks, -- Daniel Moerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
