Luca Capello wrote: > tags 503255 + upstream > tags 503255 + patch > tags 503255 + fixed-upstream > thanks > > Hi David! > > Since Thiemo Seufer did the last SBCL upload, I now directly cc:ed him > to be sure he reads this message. > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:41:35 +0200, David Matthew Mattli wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:49:52PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > >> I haven't looked yet at it in details, but is there any upstream bug > >> opened, maybe with a patch that can backported to SBCL-1.0.17? In that > >> case the fix can be easily applied to the version already present in > >> lenny and then the migration will be smoother. > [...] > > Thanks for your quick reply. I've tracked down the fixed applied in > > the sbcl cvs for this specific issue. > > Thank you for having followed this issue, I really appreciate. > > > The relevant messages to sbcl-commit are here for x86: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1KOy9Y-0006Iv-Uh%40sc8-pr-cvs8.sourceforge.net&forum_name=sbcl-commits > > > > And here for amd64: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=E1KOy9Z-0006Iy-1x%40sc8-pr-cvs8.sourceforge.net&forum_name=sbcl-commits > > > > The following patch resolves the issue for me on x86 but I haven't > > tested it on amd64. > > Thiemo, do you want to upload a bugfix version with the two patches > above or should I take care of it?
Working on it now. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]