Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3.2
Severity: normal

When saving a draft of a mail that is to be encrypted I'm asked whether
I want the draft to be encrypted before saved.  That's good, though it's
not so good that the encryption fails.  This is the content of the
dialogue box describing the failure:

 USERID_HINT 88C59369AB4DFBA4 Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 NEED_PASSPHRASY 88C59369AB4DFBA4 88C59369AB4DFBA4 17 0
 GOOD_PASSPHRASE
 INV_RECP 0 <>

 gpg command line and output:
 /usr/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 - -t -e -s
 --encrypt-to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -r <> -u <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 --use-agent
 gpg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: skipped: public key already present
 gpg: <>: skipped: public key not found
 gpg: [stdin]: sign+encrypt failed: public key not found

I'm not really sure why the recipient is `<>'.  I've entered a recipient
for the email (and I have that public key).  It would make sense to not
bother with the recipient for drafts, but in this case it seems to only
have been done half-way.

/M

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages enigmail depends on:
ii  gnupg                         1.4.9-3    GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii  icedove                       2.0.0.17-1 free/unbranded thunderbird mail/ne
ii  libc6                         2.7-15     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.3.2-1  GCC support library
ii  libnspr4-0d                   4.7.1-4    NetScape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++6                    4.3.2-1    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

enigmail recommends no packages.

enigmail suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to