On Oct 05, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are missing the point: maintaining reputation data associated to IP > > addresses is not cheap at all nor very reliable, because IP addresses > > tend to change and mail to be forwarded. > > DK/DKIM (and partially SPF) solve these problems by allowing receivers > > to reliably associate reputation data to domains instead of IP addresses. > So, if only the entire internet would change how they handle mail and > participate in $pet_scheme, we could do something about email problems? > I refer you to the FUSSP. At no time I argued that everybody needs to adopt DK/DKIM. Actually I argued that Debian will have no benefits from adopting DK/DKIM. Most of the relevant entities either are using or are planning to deploy DK/DKIM (except sadly hotmail, which adopted SPF).
> There are, in my experience, very few bulk senders that don't harbor > spammers. This is why your experience is not relevant. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
