Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 07:56 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> tags 500615 + patch >> thanks >> >> Dear maintainer, >> >> I've prepared an NMU for mmorph (versioned as 2.3.4.2-11.1) and uploaded it >> to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. > > Yes, please remove it from the upload queue.
Removed. > I'm assuming as well that you have done extensive testing. Can you > point me to the tests you used to verify the functionality of the patch > you wish to upload? You had marked yourself that it builds with all db versions... > Also, can you point me to a comprehensive statement of the interface > changes in the db library which may affect mmorph? I'm sure you have > that right at hand because I'm sure you went through it carefully before > making an upload. You yourself stated in the Build-Depends that whatever db version is good enough... > Finally, may I point out that it is not reasonable to file an RC bug and > then an NMU all at about the same time, at this point in the release? I didn't do that at all, I waited for a couple of days to give you time to respond. You knew already that it was coming by the way as you already commented on similar bugs... > The time for deciding to remove the package was back at the BEGINNING of > the release cycle, not now, at the end. Can you explain why you chose > to wait until now to start making such changes? I didn't wait at all, I informed maintainers at the beginning of the cycle, though if at the end of the cycle there are too much versions (5 in this case) of a library we can either remove the whole lot that depends on them or make them build against a version we do intend to be included in the release... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
