On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> +  * Non maintainer upload.
> +  * irqbalance would segfault on startup when /proc/interrupts contains
> +    an interrupt with a number of 256 or larger, since internally it
> +    stored data in a fixed-length array.  Newer versions (say 0.55) have
> +    replaced the data structure with a list so this is fixed there.  For
> +    now we just skip interrupts with such high numbers, since it's the
> +    least invasive approach during the stable cycle.
> +

The patch looks fine to me. I mean, the machines with higher interrupts
were crashing anyway, so simply chugging along ignoring them seems like
an improvement.

regards, Kyle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to