Hi, Clytie Siddall wrote: > Original: ???0 Pictures moved! > > Pictures in computing are generally referred to as "graphics" or > "images". This allows for different kinds of images, such as photos, > clip art and line-drawings. > > So I would suggest: > > "The graphics have moved."
Upstream also says "pictures" in their documentation... :) > Original: ???0 > The pictures formerly contained in the muttprint package have now > split out > to the 'ospics' package to allow them be installed without installing > muttprint and the dependencies (tetex-*) or to having installed a > smaller > package for those who do not want the images. > > The final sentence is unclear. Do you mean that users who don't want > the graphics files, can now install a smaller package? If so, I would > suggest: Yes. That and the other way round. People only wanting to install the images (after all, they may be useful elesewhere, too) don't need to install muttprint (with its dependency on tetex-*) anymore. > "This also means that users who don't want the graphics, can install > a smaller package." But in this sentence there is no explanation why ;) > Original: ???0 > So, If you want to use your pictures you have used yet you have to do > the > following steps:\n > a) install ospics ;)\n > b) change the path to the files in your configuration > > > "So, if you want to use your existing graphics, you need to:" No, nothing existing. If they just upgrade muttprint only they don't have the graphics anymore. That's the whole point of this message; if they want the graphics again they need to install ospics. > Original: ???0 > perl 5.8 (and the Debian versions before 5.8.0-16 which includes the > fix) > have problems with UTF8 as they apperently double-encode the string. > > "apparently" Thanks. > Original: ???0 > To use muttprint's UTF8 features you need to use that version or > higher... > > This is confusing. You've already said that version 5.8 isn't > compatible with UTF-8, then you say here that in order to use > muttprint's UTF-8 features, one should use "that version or higher". > "That version" means perl 5.8 here, which isn't compatible. If you > mean that one must use a later version of perl than 5.8, then I would > suggest: No. I mean a greater version than 5.8.0-16 or some later version of perl itself. > I hope this is useful. :) It is. But it changes strings quite heavily and I am not 100% convinced yet for some parts so I'll look if/when I apply it. Is your vi translation based on the "old" or the one with your proposed changes integrated? Grüße/Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
