Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi, > > On So, 21 Sep 2008, LUK ShunTim wrote: >> W: invalid date > > [...] > >> Please take a look. > > I don't see a bug in texlive here, why don't you bring that up with the > maintainers of the program which failed? It was not texlive packages > that failed, it was apt-listbugs that failed. > > Do you reassign that bug or should I do?
Hi Norbert, Yes, please do. A DD's word may carry more weight. :-) > > I cannot care for programs that do interpret 2007-14 wrongly. Yes, it's as you say more probably an apt-listbugs's bug. What prompted me to report to the texlive maintainers is that other texlive packages all upgrade fine, *except* texlive-latex-base. From a user's point of view, it's very difficult to understand why this one package is anomalous. > > Best wishes > > Norbert Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
