"Raphael Geissert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008/9/14 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I already explained why I think this is a bad idea. I don't think > Actually, what I understood from what you said is that you were not sure > how useful it would be. It doesn't seem like a good idea to me to use the same tag to mean multiple things. >> anything's changed, has it? > The idea is to reuse the tag name to for example add experimental > versions of current tags, making them less false negatives prone (but > with the possibility of making them more prone to false positives). When would we not want to just add a new tag? It seems a lot simpler. > Other than that, I really believe the @information->$extra conversion > should happen at tag, not at the other sublevels as it is completely > irrelevant. I don't understand what this means, and reviewing the bug log didn't help me. Could you clarify what an "@information->$extra" conversion is? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
