On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:32:39 +0200
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:27:03 +0200
> Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > sylpheed should maybe suggests claws-mail-tools instead of
> > recommends it. apt now install recommends by default and this make
> > sylpheed pulls claws-mail too. I think this is a little bit too
> > much.
> 
>   Yep, it's probably too much. Anyway I'm considering downgrading the
>   claws-mail-tools versioned Depends on claws-mail to a Recomends:
> claws-mail
>   | sylpheed instead. This should solve this issue and seems more
>   correct:
>   scripts in tools package doesn't really need claws-mail or sylpheed
> to run but the data handled by them or even others (think conversion
> filters). What do you think about this alternative?

I don't know if dependency loop in recommends are a good thing or not.
Maybe completely drop dependency/recommends of claws-mail | sylpheed in
claws-mail-tools (and add a Enhances ?)

Regards

Laurent



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to