On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:11:50PM +0200, Julien PUYDT wrote: > Niko Tyni a écrit : >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:36:17AM +0200, Julien PUYDT wrote: >>> Package: perl-doc >>> Version: 5.10.0-14 >>> >>> Unpacking perl-doc (from .../perl-doc_5.10.0-14_all.deb) ... >>> Adding `diversion of /usr/bin/perldoc to /usr/bin/perldoc.stub by perl-doc' >>> dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/bin/perldoc.stub' with >>> different file `/usr/bin/perldoc', not allowed >>> dpkg: error processing >>> /var/cache/apt/archives/perl-doc_5.10.0-14_all.deb (--unpack): >>> subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 >>> Errors were encountered while processing: >>> /var/cache/apt/archives/perl-doc_5.10.0-14_all.deb
> $ ls -l /usr/bin/perldoc* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 125 sep 12 21:07 /usr/bin/perldoc > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 125 sep 16 23:01 /usr/bin/perldoc.stub > $ /usr/sbin/dpkg-divert --list /usr/bin/perldoc > (nothing) That's broken. I take it you don't have perl-doc currently installed? You shouldn't have perldoc.stub at all at that point. Do you get the same error if you try to install perl-doc now? What if you manually remove /usr/bin/perldoc.stub and then install perl-doc ? Again, which architecture is this? (Please consider using reportbug in the future for bug reporting, it includes this and much other possibly relevant information by default.) > It was a dist-upgrade. >From which version? > Since that seemed so strange, I did just "rm /usr/bin/perldoc.stub", > then retried to dist-upgrade : it worked :-/ > > I mentioned perl-base because it had a problem installing too (which got > fixed with dpkg --pending --configure if I remember well). Could it be > that a bad interaction triggered the problem? Hard to say, can you recall any more details? -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
