Hi Josip, thanks for the report and the patch (just applied in r652)! On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:51, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mind, I think that this shouldn't be restricted to the source package's > 'make checks'. Use reportbug instances should test the timestamp on their > shipped copy of the pseudo-package list, and if it's older than one year, > they should (offer to the user to) update it from the canonical location. > It's a really small and simple file.
Well, we never think about it, and I usually keep this list as up-to-date as possible. Maybe the best solution for this problem (maybe only present in stable, because testing/unstable is usually updated faster) is backporting. Anyhow, we'll think about it. Cheers, Sandro -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
