Hi Dan,

On 9/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MK> I'm assuming you worked out
> Yes, I figured out the right URL.
>
> MK> I don't understand your comment.  The glibc web page links to
> MK> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/ for the bugzilla -- which seems to
> MK> be an alias for the same bugzilla as soureware.org (or vice versa).
> MK> What's the problem?
>
> Well, last week I had just submitted an item to the soureware.org URL.
> So when I see we are now supposed to submit to the redhat URL, I think
> "oh no, I wasted all my time submitting to this abandoned gas station
> in the desert or something". Upon further investigation I found the
> two are the same, but soureware.org is the canonical address. So
> please use the canonical address, http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ .

How do you deduce that it is the canonical address?  I'm not saying
you are wrong, but according to
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html , the redhat address is
"canonical"...

Cheers,

Michael

> >> OK, looks good. So maybe now on the man pages just provide one
> >> hyperlink link to a bugs page, and then on that you can have one link for
> >> documentation bugs and one link for code bugs... I.e., one low
> >> maintenance link on the man pages, pointing to a very flexible bug
> >> instruction tree.
>
> MK> If I thought my advice was about filing kernel bugs was authoritative
> MK> , I'd make that change.  But it is just my thoughts and advice -- and
> MK> creating a reference in each man page to a page that describes how
> MK> kernel bugs should be reported gives that advice more authority than
> MK> it currently deserves, IMO.
>
> OK, as long as there's some path from each man page to the new
> reporting_code_bugs page, though indirect.
>


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to