On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:16:50AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:19:33PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > Hm, indeed it seems that the shipped patches are not needed any more
> > to implement ghost mode, despite what the doc says. However, the 2.4
> > patch seems to have a fix for ghost mode (which may well be related to
> > #310452), so the patches may be worth packaging anyway.
>
> That thing won't happen for sarge, and by the time of etch I'd guess 2.4
> kernels are obsolete anyway, so it seems kind of pointless. :-)
Well, there are patches for 2.6.x as well, although they do not seem
to be about ghost mode at all, but rather an update of the kernel
module. Depending on what is updated, it may still make sense to have
it, although since newer kernels are typically published at a higher
rate than autofs releases, the patch package may become repidly
obsolete. Hm. :)
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
