On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:30:15AM -0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:37:46 -0000, Trent Buck wrote: >> Obviously if the out-of-repo file isn't a symlink into the current >> repo, darcs should still say "Ignoring non-repository paths". > > May I ask for suggestions on a reasonable behaviour if the symlink was > itself in a darcs repository?
Hmm, I don't know. I hadn't considered that possibility. After all, symlinks can't themselves recorded, so I don't think darcs should care if there happens to be another _darcs directory where the symlink is. In the cold, hard light of morning, it strikes me that this feature (issue1047) might make darcs "too clever", and may be a bad idea. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
