At Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:52:14 -0700,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > In order to fix bug #485109, you apparently rewrote the bug-version
> > detection logic.
> > Now there seems to be the opposite problem, though: apt-listbugs
> > alerts for unfixed bugs that have been found only *later* than the
> > version under consideration:
>
> > I think that, with the current logic, the user will have to review
> > a lot of false positives (e.g.: bugs found in experimental, while
> > the user is using apt or aptitude to upgrade a testing system).
>
> apt-listbugs list has a special code that is different from what users
> will see in upgrade cases; so that probably doesn't apply.
>
>
> Your proposed patch looks simple, but seems to break a few testcases.
> There are a few testcases in ./test_logic.rb.
and I reviewed the test-cases and test-cases seemed more wrong than
the fix, so I fixed the testcases.
I've uploaded a new version, please see if anything looks wrong.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
