On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 13:35 +0300, Mika Hanhijärvi wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 01:26 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > severity 495144 important > > thanks > > > > I don't think grave severity for this bug is justifiable. > > It hangs the whole IDE so I think it is quite severe bug.
Lots of bugs involve hanging or crashing one application - that does not make the bug severe, critical, grave or otherwise release-critical. Important is quite high enough. > And it's not > just one option which noneone uses. it's quite likely that many users > will try to run program that way and then it crashes. Actually, a lot of programs need to be tested in different ways, providing options and passing files on the command line. Libraries cannot be tested using the Build menu, these need the 'make check' routine or calling individual tests directly in the terminal. I use Anjuta for six or seven upstream C projects - not once have I needed to execute the program from the Build menu - it is almost never appropriate. > > The compiled program can be executed normally outside Anjuta. > > > > The compiled program can be executed normally *within the terminal* in > > Anjuta. > > Yes you can do that, but I think that's just a poor excuse. Not at all - it is vital to be able to pass arbitrary options that change with each test. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
