On 26/08/2008, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 26/08/08 at 14:48 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > If you mean the Japanese list then don't look at me. > > > > I have posted about the issue on the English ruby-core and got no replies. > > > > It is expected that the two objects point to the same fd, that's what > > the code does. > > > > However, the issue I tried to raise here is that the Ruby in Debian > > behaves completely differently when a comment is added in the code. > > The latest 1.8.7 release fails a bit later with the comment but still > > fails. > > > Well, the comment might cause a slightly different scheduling to happen. > Here, it fails both with and without the comment.
It should not be the case. As I understand it the whole file is parsed and only then executed so the comment should not be present anymore once the code is running. For me it fails about once out of ten runs with the comment and always without it. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
