On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:04:51 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Back in the days when dh7 didn't exist yet, debian/rules of the perl > module packages of pkg-perl were such that Build.PL was always > preferred over Makefile.PL. dh-make-perl also follows that.
Right, and every now and then I wonder why :) Does anybody know what was the reason for this decision (for dh-make-perl)? Should we change it? > So to me it preferring Build.PL over Makefile.PL seems like the right > thing to do and would conform to the existing practice. Joey has explained in the bug report why has chosen a different solution. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- BOFH excuse #178: short leg on process table
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
