Le August 18, 2008 08:39:05 am, vous avez écrit : > > I red the e-mails and can't find answers to any of my questions. Where do > > you think the answers would be? > > Okay, giving you the benefit of the doubt I try again. > > acpi is a tool to display the information given in /proc or /sys. > Information that is not available there simply cannot be displayed. Even if > there was another way to get this information it would be beyond the scope > of acpi to get this. Thus I see no bug in acpi because it exactly does what > it's supposed to do, display the available information. Thanks, but the manpage doesn't talk about "available information": -t | --thermal show thermal information
But -t doesn't show thermal information here. This does not mean that this is an acpi bug, only that acpi exposes a bug somewhere. But if you believe that this is no acpi bug, then the bug report should be reassigned rather than closed. > > On your system the kernel does not give this information to the userland > binary acpi. I cannot tell why, this could be a kernel bug or a missing > feature. Now this is definitely not the way it should be but there is no > way acpi can change this. This is why I'm not sure this isn't an acpi bug. If the bug isn't in something acpi relies on (missing information is just a "missing feature"), then the bug is in acpi for not properly handling a missing feature. However, if you're sure that Linux is buggy, then I'm fine with reassigning the bug to Linux. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
