notfound 464035 2:3.2.0-4 thanks On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:19:31PM -0500, Peter Hombach wrote: > I could be a serious bug, but it may not have been a bug at all. There > were two things that happened at almost the same time on my side: the > samba upgrade, and a failing DMA chip of a HD in our fileserver, which > in part damaged the filesystem. I restored the fileserver from our > routine backup, with the exception of system files (root, /usr, /var > partitions), for which I chose a clean installation, meaning that also > samba got a fresh start. For convenience, I copied the old smb.conf, > rather than starting from scratch (the file is complex because of > different directories with different access rights).
> I also properly established the Linux users before starting samba, and > after checking it with swat, I just assumed that everything was fine. > However, I do not know whether samba is supposed to subsequently use the > Linux user information without running pdbedit - I think it should, but > it didn't. So, it is up to you to decide whether this constitutes a bug. Ok. I have to say that this is not a bug, then; samba deliberately allows for the use case of local users that are not intended to be visible to samba clients. So I'm marking this bug as 'notfound' in 2:3.2.0-4, since that issue appears to be unrelated to the one originally reported. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]