Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 4, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Paul Collins wrote: >> Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> On Aug 3, 2008, at 11:10 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:37:19AM +1200, Paul Collins wrote: >>>>> "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:15:33PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:13:19AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>>>>>> I just cut the 1.1.3 nfs-utils release. Unfortunately I'm having >>>>>>>> issues accessing my kernel.org account so for the moment the >>>>>>>> tar ball is only available on SourceForge: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs >>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1.1.3 clients don't work with a 1.0.10 server anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> Very weird--it might make sense if upgrading nfs-utils broke the >>>>>> mount >>>>>> itself, but here it seems the mount is succeeding and subsequent >>>>>> file >>>>>> access (which I'd expect to only involve the in-kernel client >>>>>> code) is >>>>>> failing. Maybe there's some difference in the mount options? >>>>>> What does >>>>>> /proc/self/mounts say? I assume these are all v2 or v3 mounts? >>>>> >>>>> I discovered today that I was no longer able to write to the v3 >>>>> mount on >>>>> my 1.1.2 server. I checked /proc/mounts and noticed sec=null on >>>>> the >>>>> mount. Either adding sec=sys to the client's mount options or >>>>> downgrading to nfs-common 1.1.2 on the client fixes the problem. >>>> >>>> That would do it! >>>> >>>> So it sounds like there's a bug that causes mount.nfs to get the >>>> default >>>> mount options wrong? >>> >>> I'm not sure I'm following this. I can't think of a user-space >>> mount.nfs change in 1.1.3 that would affect the sec= option. >>> >>> Paul, which kernel are you running on your clients? >> >> Either 2.6.26 or 2.6.27-rc1+. I'll double-check. > > It would be interesting if you could try both. I suspect 2.6.26 > doesn't exhibit this problem, as 27-rc1 has changes in the NFS mount > parser that affect "sec=".
I had the problem with 2.6.26. I didn't try 2.6.27-rc1 on that machine. > Also, enabling NFS mount debugging messages when performing the mount > that eventually doesn't work would be enlightening (for me). Either: I won't be around that machine for a week or so. >> Whichever one it was, the problem was present with 1.1.3 installed, >> and >> not present with 1.1.2 installed. Same here. Regards /Rasmus -- Rasmus Bøg Hansen MSC Aps Bøgesvinget 8 2740 Skovlunde 44 53 93 66 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
