Hi, > lazygal allows one to set the final size with --image-size, but what if some > of my pictures are landscape and others portrait? Visiting the example > gallery > on the upstream website answers this question: lazygal can't handle that :-( > For example, let's say that most of my images are landscape, 800x600. If I > pass > --image-size medium=800x600 then the few portrait images (which are naturally > 600x800) will be sized down to 480x600.
>From where I stand, this is actually an expected behaviour : this way, portrait images do not need more scrolling on the webpage than landscape ones, which is nice for browsing : if size are aranged in a way that no scrolling is needed for landscape images, then no scrolling is required for portrait ones either. Anyway, I've got an override for this behaviour ready but I'm not really sure it is usefull. What am I missing here? > Actually, what I would _really_ like is an option for lazygal to simply not > resize > existing images at all, is that asking too much? There is the -O, --original option that copies the original pictures in the destination directory. However, the next version of lazygal will understand 0x0 dimensions in the -s option as an instruction not to resize pictures for this size. Patch available[1]. Cheers, Alex [1] http://sousmonlit.dyndns.org/~niol/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=lazygal;a=commitdiff;h=20080803132209-85ee7-4a53b87f7646e6070d87da063dfb0bd1b2dd5b83.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
