On 11464 March 1977, Henk Koster wrote:
> Just like that, eh? Some guy proposes to chuck oo2c (and liboo2c-dev and
> liboo2c3), and next you know it it's gone.

Thats exactly how it works. Someone asks for a removal, someone does the
removal.

> I'm sure that someone here will reply that it's policy and that I
> should have protested earlier.  Well, fuck policy if that means
> leaving ordinary users (like myself) in trouble.

Policy isnt that nice to fuck, we usually prefer girls for that, sorry,
cant help you there.

> I would certainly have protested if I'd known that this was coming,
> but I don't normally troll these messages. Now, with Lenny frozen, I
> presume there's no way to rectify this.

There is always a way to rectify things. There might be timing issues
for Lenny, yes. Where is the problem, removing something from Debian
doesn't remove it from your system.

> Oh, just for the record: I've thought about adopting this package, but
> cannot even come close to the requirements of the exalted priesthood of
> Debian maintainers. 

Try praising the almighty Debian gods a little more, that might help.

> Thanks for nothing.

Thanks for amusing us.
Should you want to have a real discussion or actually try to deliver an
opinion we should listen to you might want to try by writing a mail
thats not insulting. But as it might happen that you prefer insulting
others, we tried our best to follow your standard while crafting this
reply.

-- 
bye, Joerg
Some AM to his NM on [11 Aug. 2004]:
You already won't get through Front Desk and Account Manager approvals before 
sarge,[...]
[Note: He made it! :) ]

Attachment: pgpBtljzGy4WY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to