Dear Guillem and Aptitude maintainers,

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/pipermail/ilugc/2008-July/042594.html
>>
>> In essence, this may necessitate machine readable copyright format,
>> but I think it would be worth taking this forward.
>
> The stuff done on RPM is not good enough. Describing the whole package
> licensing situation in only a field is not sufficient, that's one of
> the reasons we have the copyright file.
>
> Making dpkg output this file while its format is not (yet) standardized,
> and there does not seem to be consensus that it will be in the near
> future, seems like not that useful, as the tools trying to analyze
> such output would only work if it was in a standardized format.

I am in agreement with you. It would require a monumental effort in
standardization. Even then, there are several exceptions and
non-standard licenses which we would have to deal with.

> The other problem is that the administrator is allowed (per policy) to
> remove anything under /usr/share/doc/, so dpkg will not be able to
> always output such information.

True.

>> Do inform me if I need to report this elsewhere, or if this has
>> already been reported elsewhere.
>
> I guess a more appropriate place for this would be the front-ends,
> in the same way «aptitude changelog foo» shows the changelog, taking it
> from a remote repository even w/o needing the package to be installed,
> the same could be done with the copyright file (it's even on the same
> host). Althought the format is still a problem, and it might make
> sense to delay providing such an option until such format is more
> wide-spread.
>
> Reassigning, now you might have to convince the aptitude maintainers. :)

Thanks, Guillem, for the patient explanation. I guess this may not
happen in the near future, but I would still request the Aptitude
maintainers to keep this option open, so that somewhere in the future,
we could see such a feature come in. Of course, you guys are in a
better position to judge the issue, but all the same...

Thanks.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to