On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > You better ask again on the quagga-dev/user mailing list for a comment > on this bug and, if you have time, add some examples how a Cisco would act > or what the RFCs say etc.
Thanks for your reply; I followed up to quagga-dev. This problem seems fairly straightforward; unless I'm missing something, there is absolutely no reason for bgpd(8) to see the *local* end of a point-to-point link as the proper nexthop when announcements are being received from the *remote* end of the tunnel. We'll see what they have to say. john -- John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-< \_ / \ ---- < \, www.horde.net/ __(_)/_(_)________/ \_______(_) /_(_)__ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
