On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:06:21AM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:18:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > Hi, > > > 'm' is smaller than 'r'. This change was done intentionaly to mimic the > > criteria used in GRUB Legacy's version of update-grub. > > But that's the point... m is smaller than r, so r is a *higher version* than > m, > which means it should be preferred, shouldn't... Even more true for 01, 02, > etc... If I update some kernel configuration (which version was 00) and > create a > 01 or 02 I'd like those to be booted first, don't I? Or should I give it a > lower > version to make sure it's put first?
Sorry, you're right. It seems to differ in behaviour from the GRUB Legacy version, even if the code is the same. I wonder how could have this happened.. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
