On Jul 23, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 July 2008 03:32, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > With a separate script for setting up udev (mounting tmpfs and creating > > > device nodes) then we can avoid granting excessive permissions to the > > > regular init.d scripts under SE Linux. > > > > Exactly, what kind of non-theoretical benefits will this bring? > Making SE Linux policy work on Debian as well as it does on Fedora. Please try harder to persuade me. Note that "Red Hat does it differently" is not an argument I care about much. I do not mind modifying the package to work with SELinux, but I need a detailed explanation of the reason for changes.
> SE Linux in a strict configuration will work right now in Lenny with this > change. Exactly why can't you fix the SELinux policy? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
