Am Montag, den 21.07.2008, 19:07 +0100 schrieb Justin B Rye: > > Samba 4 is not specifically aimed at supporting SMB2 however - it supports > > SMB itself > > just as well. SMB2 is also disabled by default. > You're agreeing with me - it does specifically aim at adding support > for SMB2 (I didn't say anything about _dropping_ support for SMB). No - your wording makes it sound like SMB2 is the main feature of Samba 4. It's just a minor part of Samba 4 and Samba 3 will probably support it as well soon.
> >> Then the samba 4 package would be something like this: > My point is that the fix may require coordination across the entire > suite - unless the plan is for Samba 4 to replace Samba 3 early in > Lenny+1, in which case just fixing Samba 4 would do. I could of > course submit separate bugreports against each package, but would > those be welcome when we're going into a freeze? The samba and samba4 packages will be maintained separately in lenny+1. So it would be nice to have a bug report as well for samba 3. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/ Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
