hello Simon, > Here are some remarks before we can add your mirror to the list. > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:13:14AM +0000, Boian Bonev wrote: > > Can you check you are using the very last version of anonftpsync ? > http://www.debian.org/mirror/anonftpsync
yes i downloaded it from debian.org 2 days ago > Please delete ftp://debian.ipacct.com/debian-non-US/ which is deprecated > since the release of sarge, a long time ago. ok >> IPv6: no >> Archive-upstream: debian.proxad.net > > hurd-i386 is not yet updated on ftp.bg.debian.org, but once this is > done, that may be better to mirror from a closer/faster server (for > example ftp.hu.debian.org or ftp.ro.debian.org) > > BTW, it gives us (the mirror team) a clearer view of the mirrors > dependancy. it may be geographically closer, but i get better bandwidth from there. i preffer to download from france or germany - it is closer and faster. e.g. the links to Romania which is next to us go to Frankfurt and back... >> Security-upstream: security.debian.org > > It is very slow from outside, is that possible to raise this limit a > bit, at least to allow checks in good conditions ? for ubuntu i have released the checks for certain networks, i have tried but there is no difference how much bandwidth is set it always gets full... >> local loop is unlimited > How much is "unlimited" ? :) > 1Gbps ? :) i have two bonded nics. considering that 1gbps is 800mbit in reality and some disbalance on the bonding, lets say my max is 1.5gbps although i am not sure the machine will stand on multiple scattered requests at such rates anyways i use combined nginx+apache setup and i may say that performance is 5-6 times better than apache. currently apache is used only for fancy indexing. on ubuntu mirror i have had ~220mbit peak on release times and the bottleneck was disk. i have changed it but i will not know what will happen until next release. > We will take care of the pushing stuff, once the status of ftp.bg.d.o is > clarified with hurd-i386. indeed i preffer not to mirror from there... i use ubuntu for desktop and debian for servers for years so i may say i have had less problems with the ludost.net mirror, but it is not full. if it was all ok, i would not have taken the burden to support one more mirror. anyways i prefer not to speak bad for the guys who maintain ftp.bg.d.o - with mirrors more is better, not to mention that personally i have used ftp.bg.d.o for so long time :) kind regards, b. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
