also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.12.1417 +0200]: > Thanks Martin. I only have one concern with your patch (well, two, > actually): I'm not sure how the library version is being used, but > surely, we should take care there won't be a problem with us > having a somehow conflicting version number with upstream (next > time they add a CA, they are likely to use this version ; are we > going to keep increasing this version compared to upstream ?)
This is a very good point. I don't know what the version number is for, but maybe it'll be sufficient to not bump the version number. I'll try it out... > My second concern is that your patch looks like a NUMdiff, but is > not using dpatch like the rest of the package. But don't care too > much about that, that's just nitpicking ;) I hate dpatch. End of discussion. :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems if you see an onion ring -- answer it!
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
