On Thursday 10 July 2008 03:00:24 =?UTF-8?B?VmVkcmFuIEZ1cmHEjQ==?= wrote: > Kel Modderman wrote: > > > On Thursday 10 July 2008 01:11:41 Vedran =?UTF-8?Q?Fura=C4=8D?= wrote: > >> Package: wpasupplicant > >> Version: 0.6.3-2 > >> Severity: important > > > > Why is every problem with wpasupplicant Severity: important ... ;-) > > Yesterday I tried to setup WEP encryption but failed (reported #489948) > and today tried WPA and also failed (reported this). So I assumed that > wpa_supplicant is completely broken for ad-hoc mode and I find this > important. If you disagree then please change the severity. > Btw. I usualy report this kind of bugs directly to the upstream but their > bugzilla requires me to get an account and I don't want to register.
I understand, was just making a cheeky remark based on the severity of last dozen or so bug reports. > > >> I tried to setup WPA in Ad-Hoc mode but failed. On the other hand in > >> windows > >> this works fine which means that other peer is configured properly. > > > > http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/2008-July/018036.html > > Yes, I think I saw that. There's a 2.6.26-rc9 package on kernel > buildserver so I only need "recent git pull of the supplicant". You can try something from: http://sidux.net/kelmo/debian/pool/main/w/wpasupplicant/ Or wait for next upload I guess. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
