On Saturday 05 July 2008 16:30:31 Arthur de Jong wrote: [...]
> I don't think that having spaces in POSIX group names is a good idea > because it is bound to break stuff. > > If you can come up with good arguments as to why this should be > supported I may reconsider though. The main argument i have is that it makes it hard to use libnss-ldapd with samba. LDAP based samba setups, including nss based user name and group mappings, are well documented: http://us6.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/unixclients.html#sdcsdmldap About "bound to break stuff"... many people use LDAP based samba setups based on the above guide, if it did break stuff, i guess we would have heard by now. Also, i thought ibnss-ldapd was a drop in replacement for ibnss-ldap, this test obviously breaks compatibility. At the very least, could the fact that it doesn't work with ldap setups based on the Samba-Guide be documented somewhere? Andreas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
