On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:35:55PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > could you please "fix" this by uploading the latest version of asc with > the archs list trimmed down to i386 and amd64, the archs that seem > officially supported by upstream, to t-p-u?
I'm not sure if it is possible to "fix" it this way. If some package was released/built for all archs and then there are problems on one of them then it is RC bug. Reuploading without problematic arch isn't considered as a solution for this RC bug. But as I said I'm not sure about this. > asc has been removed from Sarge for now and it seems quite silly to > exclude a really well-made game from Sarge just because it has problems > on a fringe architecture hardly anyone uses nowadays, while it's working > for the two archs that cover at least 95% of the installed base. I've > played the i386 version for quite some time and it's nowhere in a > non-releasable state. It can than be ported to alpha in sid after Sarge > has been released. Yep it works great on i386 for me. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
