On 01-Jul-2008, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > lojban-common doesn't have the "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" control > field and your upload will be rejected. Please read the information > under the "Uploading packages" subtitle at > http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers
Okay, I've read that. I have the correct address listed as the 'Maintainer' field for the 'lojban-common' package, and that's the same address I'm using when I sign the '.changes' file. > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:11:26PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > >It turns out that the wrong address is also currently listed at > ><URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm-uploaders.html> for this key: > > > > dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ben Finney > > 9CFE12B0791A4267887F520CB7AC2E51BD41714B > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is listed at the URL above because it's the primary > userid of gpg key BD41714B in /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg You're right, the primary userid differs from the one I'm using for Debian. But one of the main points of having multiple userids on a GnuPG key is to be able to use them in different contexts while using the same key — i.e. to allow the identities to be related while remaining discrete. I'm using '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' for my Debian userid, which is one of the current userids for that key, and has been explicitly signed by Debian developers. Can we please update the system so that the valid userid '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', which matches the Maintainer field, is accepted and recognised? -- \ Rommel: “Don't move, or I'll turn the key on this can of Spam!” | `\ —The Goon Show, _Rommel's Treasure_ | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
