Hi Sandro,
Am Montag, den 30.06.2008, 15:36 +0000 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking
System:
> E-Mail-Nachricht-Anlage
> > -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
> > Von: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Betreff: Your version of <package> (<version>) is newer than that in
> > Debian - fixed
> > Datum: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:50 +0200
> >
> > Version: 3.39-0.1
> >
> > As reported in changelog for that version:
> >
> > * Indicate that in mode > standard incoming and NEW are also checked with
> > --check-available (Closes: #450523, #447380)
> >
> > So, this bug is fixed, as long as you use "mode > standard"; infact:
Eh, no. For one, I used the standard mode, as indicated by reportbug in
the bug report.
Second, I didn't download the emacs package from neither NEW nor
incoming, but indeed from a normal Debian mirror.
> > Your version (1.7.5) of debtags appears to be out of date.
> > The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive:
> > incoming: 1.7.6
> > Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?
> > reportbug: exiting due to user interrupt.
> > $
> >
> > and debtags was uploaded minutes ago.
My bugreport is the other way round: reportbug claims I have a newer
version than the one available in Debian. In your example, reportbug
tells you that there is a newer version available in Debian.
According to the changelog[1], the package version in the bug report was
uploaded on 09 Jun 2006, my bugreport was 5 days later.
[1] I use Romain's emacs-snapshots packages from his homepage and the
full changelog starting 2004 is included.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
