Hello,
I have additional information about the bug.
As it was the opportunity to try "git bisect" I tried to find the commit
that introduced the regression this way.

I took the 1.1.7 version as the "good" version (I tested, it created the
iso with a deep directory structure ok) and 1.1.8 as the "bad" version, in
git terms. I used a small "test.sh" script that rebuilt genisoimage each
time git "switched" commits, and created a small deep directory structure
to test genisoimage on it.

Here are the last lines of running "git bisect run ./test.sh":

###############
./build/genisoimage/genisoimage: Directories too deep for 
'youpi/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8' (7) max is 6.
cf36ca94fbd5c523dd8d106f528da97c1eec55d4 is first bad commit
commit cf36ca94fbd5c523dd8d106f528da97c1eec55d4
Author: 93sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Sun May 25 21:00:55 2008 +0000

    genisoimage: Applied patch from Roman Rakus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
    preserve directory permissions.
    
    
    git-svn-id: svn://svn.debian.org/debburn/cdrkit/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
a95a6be8-091b-0410-adaf-d31e6857962f

:100644 100644 74442af32ede6b33be80fe31ebc536a7e0dc8d66 
cbe6b76b4ec8cd4d9a3bd84c2cb32dd71534cb59 M      Changelog
:040000 040000 e731a720a0890204ca23d2da37603bb6204cd879 
c94c52da9968e242e963db771397a4f06d72d4a8 M      genisoimage
bisect run success
#################

Hence the problematic revision seems to be the 807th one if I am to believe
git. Taking a look at the source shows many changes into genisoimage, but
I'm not familiar enough with the codebase to take a guess :-(

Hope this helps, though.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to