On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:11:30 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > AFAICT one option would be to turn that into a warning instead of
> > reject.  Another is to have check_hash make the same checks as
> > Upload.check_dsc_against_db for orig.tar.gz files that already exist.
> 
> The first is not an option, as we don't want to have broken checksums in
> the archive.

yeah, good point..

> And as the check currently retrieves the checksum from the
> DB (where SHA sums are not available), the fix is a bit more involved.
> 
i guess that means running sha*sum on the actual file in the archive,
then?

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to