Hi Ben, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Please provide the useful acpi_fakekey utility in a package of its own. > Users who > don't want and/or can't use acpi-support (due to conflicts) have to resort to > building their acpi_fakekey on their own if they want to use it. > > This would have the added benefit of splitting out the only arch-specific > component > from the otherwise arch-independent acpi-support package, allowing it to > become > "Architecture: all".
Definitely a worthwhile suggestion. I was already considering splitting off the legacy acpi-support suspend functionality into a separate package, might as well split this one off as well. I'll discuss it with my co-maintainers and hopefully this will happen. Cheers, Bart -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
