On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:36:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: || I am sorry if anything in my message gave the impression that your help || was not welcome.
You did not give that impression. At least, not to me. I'm sorry if I gave you the impression that you did give that impression. ;-) || Given that in that case the package works better with dash than with || bash, I think that it is not blocking the "Switch to dash" release goal, || so I will downgrade the severity of this bug. The downgrade seems appropriate because the problem is only cosmetic. Personally, I'd say downgrade to minor. || Since the OpenSSH accident, I became reluctant to apply patches unless || it is really necessary. Yours does not have any issue of course, but it || would be one more patch to track, and I think that the lesser the || better. Your reluctance is laudable but probably not warranted. The openssh patch was an order of magnitude more invasive. || Steve M. Robbins, who is listed in the Uploaders field, is the lead || maintainer of this package, and of course has the final word. In the || meantime, I will report the issue upstream. That is precisely the proper action I think. Include the proposed patch. || I will not remove the usertag goal-dash myself. But you seem to work on || many of these bugs. If you agree that this bug is not a bashism, maybe || it can help the release team if you remove the tag? I only took part in the Utrecht BSP <http://wiki.debian.org/BSP2008/Utrecht>, and focused on some easy stuff. It *is* a bash/dash problem because there is a difference in behaviour, so goal-dash should stay. Ciao. Vincent. -- Vincent Zweije <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "If you're flamed in a group you <http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/> | don't read, does anybody get burnt?" [Xhost should be taken out and shot] | -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
