* Neil Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-11 18:10:24 CET]: > I'm the openjade maintainer, as well as jade and opensp. > > I think the best approach would be to create an openjade1.4 package, keep the > openjade1.3 package, then transform the openjade package to one that simply > depends on openjade1.3. This is analogous to the relationship between gcc, > gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4.
Only thing to keep in mind (besides that this response comes after three and a half year and the suggestion is still not done) that openjade1.3 would propably need to set an epoch for the openjade package at least so that it has a newer version than the current openjade(1.4) package. Peter, on a sidenote - do you think slony1 would have less problems with using openjade1.3 instead of openjade? My quick testbuild on powerpc made it work, I though have to wait for Aurel32 to give me his ACK for trying that out on an arm box. So long, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
