Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Boy this is embarrassing. You're right but I could swear it was working > properly when I sent you the bug report. Never mind then. Could a > description (abstract?) field be added to meta. (I can use two meta > directives with different keys in the same page right?) Or would I be > better off developing my own plugin rather than trying to piggyback on > meta?
Yes, you can put any number of meta directives on a page. Since meta maps unknown fields to <meta name=foo> headers, that's what description is used for now. That matches well with the use of meta description that you want, too. I've gone ahead and implemented that. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
