Package: doc-base Version: 0.8.16 Severity: normal [Cc'ing some people who might be interested, according to bug logs or list posts]
Hi, in #109431 you provided an analysis of doc-base/menu-mappings, and you wrote: Sections with no obvious mapping: Tex (14) => TeX or Editors/TeX or Editing/TeX I suggest to add a section for this, but to not use the name TeX (Editing/TeX is plainly wrong for most of them). Rather, I would like to make the section broader, and include everything related to typesetting. Packages which come to mind as belonging there are - debiandoc-sgml (currently using Text) - openjade (currently using Text) - lout (currently using Apps/Text). - linuxdoc-tools (currently using Apps/Text). - docbook-xsl-doc(currently using Apps/Text). According to the doc-base documentation, Text is wrong here: ,---- | Text | | Text oriented tools like dictionaries, OCR, translation, text | analysis software, etc. | `---- I don't think that this fits, since they all deal, like TeX, with producing a typeset output from somehow logically and/or physically structured and markup'ed input, not with the *contents* of that input, as the section description talks about. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages doc-base depends on: ii perl 5.8.8-7etch3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction doc-base recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
