On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 17:22 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > The xulrunner 1.9 headers now use wchar_t but still require it to be > > defined as a 16-bit type. The pkg-config files specify -fshort-wchar > > to ensure that this is the case. > > duplicate of #485618 ?
Not exactly - you think -fshort-wchar should not be used on armel; I think it should not be used anywhere. > > Now, the question is, why does it suddenly break? > > It appears to be introduced by gcc-4.3, gcc-4.2 appeared to be more > liberal with mixing -short-wchar and -long-wchar code. XULRunner 1.8 didn't specify -fshort-wchar in pkg-config files, that I noticed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
