On 08/06/08 at 13:30 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > tag 467102 + patch > thanks > > Heya, > > LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > in the first paragraph of Debian Developer's Reference 5.9.3[1]. I think > > the > > new name should also provide the obsolete name, it should be changed to [2]. > [...] > > [2] > > When you make a mistake naming your package, you should follow a two-step > > process to rename it. First, set your debian/control file to replace, > > conflict with and provide the obsolete name of the package (see the Debian > > Policy Manual for details). // snip > > Here's a complete patch for this issue. Please review:
Looks very good. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature