Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> May I ask you why you decided to go away from the naming >> 'libavcodeccvs51' to 'libavcodec51'? Having your package names introduce > > Because users can't install official packages who depends on > 'libavcodec51'.
How did you check that official binaries build against the debian version of libavcodec51 do work flawlessly with your version of libavcodec51? Seriously, I'd love to see a serious answer to that, because if there is indeed no problem, we could provide "replacment" packages for the packages in debian, and potentially consolidate packaging work. >> 'cvs' was a good indication that the package originated from you in >> bugreports. > > All my packages contains a 'Bugs:' field so bug report should not go > to the BTS if the bug is done against my packages. True, however that doesn't prevent users to report bugs anyway to debian. Happened in the past. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
